CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

White Collar enters the Bizarro world

An old rival of Neal's returns with a challenge: let's see who can counterfeit the famed bottle of wine that Marie Antoinette gifted to Ben Franklin the best. But does Neal's rival have a secret weapon up his sleeve?

- Season 1, Episode 12 - "Bottlenecked"

A few months ago I read a book by Ridley Pearson called Killer Summer. The plot centered around an attempt to sell counterfeit wine — namely, three bottles rumored to have been a gift given by Thomas Jefferson to John Adams. I’m no wine person, so as long as the bottle looks right on the outside you could probably give me anything to drink and I’d believe you about the wine’s origins. But that’s me.

In the book, the big reveal that I remember had to do with the bottle. Something about the way glass is blown today versus two hundred years ago, with the swirls going out instead of in, or something along those lines. Cesium may have been mentioned, but I remember the glass the most. But who’d have imagined that dropping an atomic bomb would wreak havoc on wine counterfeiters? White Collar’s “How to” lessons rival Burn Notice’s!

I’m not sure how I felt about meeting Neal’s “rival,” or as Peter put it “Bizarro Neal.” Matthew Keller (Ross McCall) definitely is the blue collar (get it?) version of Neal, but do we want to think of Neal like that? Did we need to imagine that someone as uncouth as Keller could do what Neal does so well? I mean, he could be awesome, but I kind of felt let down that Neal would imagine himself in direct competition with that guy. In my mind, Neal’s much more the speed of that art thief he salivated over meeting way back in the beginning of season one. Nitpicky, but I guess I just have such high hopes for Neal.

Seriously though, it was interesting to see Neal feel the pressure of another con, someone whose artistry he clearly respected. And the highbrow-ness of counterfeiting a bottle of wine that Marie Antoinette gave to Benjamin Franklin was very much in keeping with who Neal is. It’s at the complete opposite end of the spectrum from the challenge Danny and the Ocean’s Twelve gang accepted from “Night Fox” (not that that wasn’t in keeping with who they were). I enjoyed it, especially because we got to see how Neal’s mind works (and we got lots of Mozzie).

It was fun to see Kate Levering as Keller’s broker Grace Quinn … Kevin Hill was an awesome show (I know she’s done other things since, but that’s what I know her from), and the very least that entire cast deserves is acting jobs.

I’m glad that Alex (Gloria Votsis) looks set to return. As I said before, I think she could be great for Neal, and really do wonders for his character as far as his love life is concerned. I realize that she would be returning in order to help Neal find the music box, which he hopes will bring him one step closer to Kate, but I hope that, whether or not Kate was just using Neal all along, Alex is here to stay. Certainly her spending time with Neal searching for the music box will help that cause. And maybe a romance with Neal is what Mozzie meant by sweetening the deal.

Some notes and thoughts:

  • I know it’s not unheard of, but Peter’s wealthy, wine collecting ensemble was destroyed by his button-down collar. I know rich people do it (see Bill Gates), but with Neal and Peter standing next to one another at the gallery, which one of them looked like they could afford to buy wine for the sake of collecting?
  • White Collar isn’t the first show to make this mistake, but people can hear … maybe notice that there’s a security guard at the bottom of the staircase you’re climbing and don’t have a discussion that would raise suspicion. It’s like on countless shows when someone thinks, “Oh, I closed the door, so even if I yell no one on the other side will hear me.” Really?
  • Mozzie and Neal made an 18th Century bottle of wine in Neal’s apartment. Seriously?
  • The name of the auction house, Weatherbys, did not seem to be White Collar’s speed. The show doesn’t seem like the type to go for cutesy, sound-alike names. Just a thought.

Photo Credit: USA

14 Responses to “White Collar enters the Bizarro world”

February 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM

I was bothered by the location of Keller and Neal’s trespassing meet. In the beginning, I was confused as to why it seemed the show just forgot that Neal was restricted by his ankle bracelet; when the alarm beeped, I was even more confused, since that just didn’t make sense. Neal’s radius is around “his house”, which is MAYBE as far south as midtown or the southern end of Central Park. My assumption is that Water Street would be lower Manhattan– well outside of his permitted zone.

February 25, 2010 at 1:53 PM

My thought was actually on how Keller would have figured Neal’s radius out to the exact step, but you have a point. Especially since Neal’s leash is tightened up at night. Manhattan island is about 13.5 miles long, and considering where Neal’s home appears to be, I’d say you’re absolutely correct (since Water Street is all the way downtown). I think it was meant to seem crafty on Keller’s part, but someone definitely dropped the continuity (and accuracy) ball on that.

February 28, 2010 at 9:42 AM

I don’t know NY well at all, but I think Neal’s got a radius of 2 miles. Does that make sense with the meeting place?

BTW, I really enjoyed this episode (well, all of them!) — I loved the wine forgery and Mozzie needing his pats on the back and even the back and forth between white collar and blue collar Neal. And the chemistry between Neal and Peter just keeps getting better. The looks the two exchange while undercover are priceless.

February 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM

It would be a stretch. Assume June’s place is in Midtown, at the farthest South, and the distance to downtown Manhattan (Water Street) is probably a little more than 3 miles (20 city block’s equal approximately 1 mile), depending on exactly where her place is — I’d assume she lives in the low fifties, just south of Central Park. And for his leash to end halfway across that chasm? It looked cool, but I don’t think so.

February 24, 2010 at 3:35 PM

I know I posted it on the 24 post but I just saw the end of this White Collar episode and after seeing this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clnozSXyF4k

how much do you think of this episode’s final scenes were _really_ done in NY after seeing this video?

I know it’s kind of OT but I just walked in on my brother watching the show. I stopped after episode four, I just wasn’t that into it…

February 24, 2010 at 5:30 PM

I’ve seen that video recently and I honestly don’t care if the shows I watch are filmed in an oversized port-a-potty. Sure, filming at the actual location can add a bit of authenticity to a show, but I’m not watching White Collar for that so much as I am the character interaction. If they got the shape of the trees in Central Park wrong on the green-screen I just don’t care.

It’s about budget and if that’s what it takes to stay within budget and keep a fun show on the air I’m okay with that.

February 24, 2010 at 5:52 PM

My point is exactly the opposite. I was wondering how they were able to make this show look so extremely expensive. The four episodes I saw I sat there and wondered how on earth this can be a show not on one of the major networks. And the video shows scenes I would never _ever_ would have thought came out of a computer. Well maybe except those scenes on Defying Gravity, Saving Grace and Eli Stone. But those scenes from 24, Monk and Ugly Betty are insane! I mean I sat there and I was literally gaping at my monitor.

I think it’s on the one hand really really awesome, because I always rant about shows that look cheap in parts (like The Mentalist recently or every single episode of Jericho) but on the other hand it really opens up manipulation on the news. I mean if you look back on Iraq and that bogus Yellow Cake and that interview with the woman from Kuweit who said Iraqi soldiers were pulling babies from their cribs in hospitals (which started the first gulf war) then you really have to wonder how much of Capricorn One and Wag the Dog we might see on the news here and there.

“Newswipe” from the UK talked about news reporters in Haiti exaggerating the looting in Port Au Prince to an extend that it looked ridiculous, with Fox News being the voice of reason there (!).

I know I’m getting off-topic but I think this video has so many implications – and being angry about the extreme quality of these greenscreen shots wasn’t one of them. Not even a tiny little bit. If this stays on scripted shows I’m all for it. Hell Avatar the hell out of every TV show, I don’t mind. I am all for it to be honest. If shows like White Collar and Royal Pains are the result (of which I also think that it has these kinds of shots in it) then use it I say! :-)

February 25, 2010 at 1:58 PM

I agree. It is extremely impressive that technology’s come so far so as to make these things seem shot on location, expensive, and great-looking. Like you Lenny, I couldn’t care less if it’s authentic … I just want it to look it so I won’t think about it, and be able to just focus on the characters.

February 25, 2010 at 6:59 PM

I almost hate to do this, but I’m going to be a jerk and correct you on one of the most misused phrases in the English language. It’s “I couldn’t care less” and not “I could care less.” Just think about it and you’ll realize that saying you could care less implies that you do, in fact, care when you’re really trying to say you don’t care at all.

Feel free to flame me for it, I deserve it. If you dont’ already know this then here goes: Besides being a spelling nazi, overly OCD, curmudgeonly when I’m conscious and a fashion faux pas on two legs I’m also a big, huge, honking jerkwad who’s only avenue of superiority is correcting others when they screw up. I’m also a huge fan of being overly defensive when others point out my flaws, it drives women wild, but not in the good way.

(BTW, I also get snippy with my Mom when she says “irregardless” and she says it a lot)

February 26, 2010 at 12:15 PM

It’s okay. Unfortunately for you I had the power to edit my comment, as you can see above, but no harm in the correction … I DO know better. :)

February 28, 2010 at 9:39 AM

But he loves hummus! :-)

February 25, 2010 at 6:50 PM

I’m sorry, I misunderstood your point. I thought you were complaining about the lack of authenticity when you were expressing honest admiration for the effects. Then we’re in agreement on that.

And, no, I’m not going into any political discussions, you’ll have to venture there alone. I’m here for the entertainment.

March 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM

Don’t feel bad for Neal; it’s only because he handicaps himself with his abhorrence for violence that he and Keller are on even ground.

Kate Levering is a regular, and quite enjoyable, on Drop Dead Diva, which returns June 6.

Two possible explanations for Peter’s cover’s faux pas: 1) he’s nouveau riche, and doesn’t know any better, 2) he’s so obscenely wealthy that he doesn’t care in the slightest what any of the lesser rich in the room think of him.

March 8, 2010 at 1:39 PM

Good point about Peter’s cover … I guess I just don’t get the button-down collar. But I like the “I’m so rich just try and criticize me” idea!

Powered By OneLink